Abstract

The role of the hippocampus (Hp) in absence epileptic networks and the effect of endocannabinoid system on this network remain enigmatic. Here, using adapted nonlinear Granger causality, we compared the differences in network strength in four intervals (baseline or interictal, preictal, ictal and postictal) in two hours before (epoch 1) and six hours (epochs 2, 3 and 4) after the administration of three different doses of the endocannabinoid agonist WIN55212-2 (WIN) or solvent. Local field potentials were recorded for eight hours in 23 WAG/Rij rats in the Frontal (FC), Parietal PC), Occipital Cortex (OC) and in the hippocampus (Hp). The four intervals were visually marked by an expert neurophysiologist and the strength of couplings between electrode pairs were calculated in both directions.
Ictally, a strong decrease in coupling strength was found between Hp and FC, as well as a large increase bidirectionally between PC and FC and unidirectionally from FC and PC to OC, and from FC to Hp over all epochs.
The highest dose of WIN increased the couplings strength from FC to Hp and from OC to PC during 4 and 2 hr respectively in all intervals, and decreased the FC to PC coupling strength postictally in epoch 2. A single rat showed generalized convulsive seizures after the highest dose: this rat shared not only coupling changes with the other rats in the same condition, but showed many more. WIN reduced SWD number in epoch 2 and 3, their mean duration increased in epochs 3 and 4.
Conclusions: during SWDs FC and PC are strongly coupled and drive OC, while at the same time the influence of Hp to FC is diminished. The first is in agreement with the cortical focus theory, the latter demonstrates an involvement of the hippocampus in SWD occurrence and that ictally the hippocampal control of the cortico-thalamo-cortical system is lost. WIN causes dramatic network changes which have major consequences for the decrease of SWDs, the occurrence of convulsive seizures, and the normal cortico-cortical and cortico-hippocampal interactions