Fitzgibbons, Jonathan (2010) ‘Not in any doubtfull dispute’? Reassessing the nomination of Richard Cromwell. Historical Research, 83 (220). pp. 281-300. ISSN 0950-3471
Full content URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2281.2009.00508.x
Documents |
|
![]() |
PDF
Fitzgibbons 1 Historical Research Article copy.pdf - Whole Document Restricted to Repository staff only 181kB |
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Item Status: | Live Archive |
Abstract
This article challenges the widespread belief that Oliver Cromwell nominated his eldest son as his successor. By looking closely at private correspondence, official publications and parliamentary debates, the article demonstrates that the surviving evidence does not suggest that Oliver Cromwell ever nominated a successor in his own lifetime. Instead, it would seem that the ultimate decision to confer the title of lord protector on Richard Cromwell was taken by the privy council at Whitehall in the hours following his father's death. The implications of this are examined, both in terms of the council's motives and the ultimately debilitating effect it had on the protectorate as a whole.
Keywords: | Oliver Cromwell, Richard Cromwell, English Civil War and Revolution, English Civil War, British Civil Wars, English Revolution, Protectorate, Interregnum |
---|---|
Subjects: | V Historical and Philosophical studies > V142 Modern History 1600-1699 |
Divisions: | College of Arts > Lincoln School of Humanities and Heritage > Lincoln School of Humanities and Heritage (Humanities) |
ID Code: | 54343 |
Deposited On: | 13 Apr 2023 11:57 |
Repository Staff Only: item control page