Skip to main content
Book cover

International Conference on Sustainability in Energy and Buildings

SEB 2022: Sustainability in Energy and Buildings 2022 pp 1–11Cite as

Impact of Climate on Building Energy Performance, Urban Built Form and Urban Geometry

Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST,volume 336)

Abstract

The study investigates the impact of climate on the residential building energy performance and its relationship with urban built form and geometry of the built environment. It aims to identify the most energetically sustainable urban built form and optimal urban geometry in different climates that results in higher energy performance of buildings. Geometrical models of four urban built forms are developed, and a simulation method is used to conduct sensitivity analyses over the four case studies (cities of London, Singapore, Helsinki and Phoenix) that are selected based on specific climatic criteria. The Energy Equity (EE) indicator is used for demonstration of the results, which simultaneously considers the amount of building energy demand as well as energy generation by building-mounted PVs. The results show that increasing the cut-off angle (i.e., reducing buildings distance) reduces building energy demand in cooling-dominated buildings (i.e., in Singapore and Phoenix) between 6% and 56% while increases building energy demand in heating-dominated buildings (i.e., in London and Helsinki) between 2% and 16.5%. Hence, the impact of distance between buildings on building energy demand is more significant in hot climates. In general, building energy demand in London is the lowest among the case studies, while it is the highest in Singapore (up to 219% higher than London). London also shows the highest value of EE (demonstrating the best energy performance) and Helsinki shows the lowest (up to 51% lower than London). It is recommended to use the tunnel-court built form to have a more energy-efficient buildings, specifically in hot climates.

Keywords

  • Building energy performance
  • Urban built form
  • Climate

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

References

  1. Ahmadian, E., Byrd, H., Sodagar, B., Matthewman, S., Kenney, C., Mills, G.: Energy and the form of cities: the counterintuitive impact of disruptive technologies. Archit. Sci. Rev. 62(2), 145–151 (2019)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  2. Ji, Q., Li, C., Makvandi, M., Zhou, X.: Impacts of urban form on integrated energy demands of buildings and transport at the community level: a comparison and analysis from an empirical study. Sustain. Cities Soc. 79, 103680 (2022)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  3. Mangan, S.D., Oral, G.K.: Impacts of future weather data on the energy performance of buildings in the context of urban geometry. Cogent Eng. 7(1), 1714112 (2020)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  4. Ahmadian, E., Sodagar, B., Mills, G., Byrd, H., Bingham, C., Zolotas, A.: Sustainable cities: the relationships between urban built forms and density indicators. Cities 95 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tsirigoti, D., Tsikaloudaki, K.: The effect of climate conditions on the relation between energy efficiency and urban form. Energies 11(3), 582 (2018)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  6. Heidari, S.: A deep courtyard as the best building form for desert climate an introduction to effects of air movement (Case study: Yazd). Desert. 15(1), 19–26 (2010)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Oral, G.K., Yilmaz, Z.: Building form for cold climatic zones related to building envelope from heating energy conservation point of view. Energy Build. 35(4), 383–388 (2003)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  8. Dursun, D., Yavas, M.: Climate-sensitive urban design in cold climate zone: the City of Erzurum, Turkey. Int. Rev. Spat. Plann. Sustain. Dev. 3(1), 17–38 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Muhaisen, A.S.: Shading simulation of the courtyard form in different climatic regions. Build. Environ. 41(12), 1731–1741 (2006)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  10. Kocagil, I.E., Oral, G.K.: The effect of building form and settlement texture on energy efficiency for hot dry climate zone in turkey. Energy Proc. 78, 1835–1840 (2015)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  11. Khalili, M., Amindeldar, S.: Traditional solutions in low energy buildings of hot-arid regions of Iran. Sustain. Cities Soc. 13, 171–181 (2014)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  12. Strømann-Andersen, J., Sattrup, P.A.: The urban canyon and building energy use: urban density versus daylight and passive solar gains. Energy Build. 43(8) (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ahmadian, E., Sodagar, B., Bingham, C., Elnokaly, A., Mills, G.: Effect of urban built form and density on building energy performance in temperate climates. Energy Build. 110762 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Peel, M.C., Finlayson, B.L., McMahon, T.A.: Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Chua, K., Chou, S.: Energy performance of residential buildings in Singapore. Energy 35(2), 667–678 (2010)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  16. GM, R.B.: Green mark for residential buildings. Technical Guide and Requirements. In: Authority BaC (Ed.). Singapore, pp. 30, 75 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dorer, V., Allegrini, J., Orehounig, K., Moonen, P., Upadhyay, G., Kämpf, J., et al.: Modelling the urban microclimate and its impact on the energy demand of buildings and building clusters. Proc. BS. 2013, 3483–3489 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Meteonorm. Meteonorm Software: Meteotest. https://meteonorm.com/en/

  19. U.S. Climate Data. Climate Phoenix—Arizona (2021). https://www.usclimatedata.com/climate/phoenix/arizona/united-states/usaz0166

  20. Guhathakurta, S., Williams, E.: Impact of urban form on energy use in central city and suburban neighborhoods: lessons from the phoenix metropolitan region. Energy Proc. 75, 2928–2933 (2015)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  21. Sailor, D.J., Elley, T.B., Gibson, M.: Exploring the building energy impacts of green roof design decisions–a modeling study of buildings in four distinct climates. J. Build. Phys. 35(4), 372–391 (2012)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  22. SAP: The government’s standard assessment procedure for energy rating of dwellings (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Palmer, J., Cooper, I.: United Kingdom housing energy fact file. Department of Energy and Climate Change London (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rode, P., Keim, C., Robazza, G., Viejo, P., Schofield, J.: Cities and energy: urban morphology and residential heat-energy demand. Environ. Plann. B. Plann. Des. 41(1), 138–162 (2014)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  25. Steemers, K.: Energy and the city: density, buildings and transport. Energy Build. 35(1), 3–14 (2003)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  26. Ratti, C., Baker, N., Steemers, K.: Energy consumption and urban texture. Energy Build. 37(7), 762–776 (2005)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  27. Coccolo, S., Monna, S., Kaempf, J.H., Mauree, D., Scartezzini, J.-L.: Energy demand and urban microclimate of old and new residential districts in a hot arid climate. In: 36th International Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture, Los Angeles (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Chan, A.: Effect of adjacent shading on the thermal performance of residential buildings in a subtropical region. Appl. Energy 92, 516–522 (2012)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  29. Nikoofard, S., Ugursal, V.I., Beausoleil-Morrison, I.: Effect of external shading on household energy requirement for heating and cooling in Canada. Energy Build. 43(7), 1627–1635 (2011)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  30. Numan, M., Almaziad, F., Al-Khaja, W.: Architectural and urban design potentials for residential building energy saving in the Gulf region. Appl. Energy 64(1–4), 401–410 (1999)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Antwerp, Groenenborgerlaan 171, 2020, Antwerp, Belgium

    Ehsan Ahmadian & Ivan Verhaert

  2. University of Lincoln, Brayford Way, Lincoln, LN6 7TS, UK

    Amira Elnolaky & Behzad Sodagar

Authors
  1. Ehsan Ahmadian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Amira Elnolaky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Behzad Sodagar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ivan Verhaert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ehsan Ahmadian .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff School of Art and Design, The Sustainable and Resilient Built Environment research group, Cardiff, UK

    John Littlewood

  2. KES International Research, Shoreham-by-sea, UK

    Robert J. Howlett

  3. KES International, Selby, UK

    Lakhmi C. Jain

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ahmadian, E., Elnolaky, A., Sodagar, B., Verhaert, I. (2023). Impact of Climate on Building Energy Performance, Urban Built Form and Urban Geometry. In: Littlewood, J., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds) Sustainability in Energy and Buildings 2022 . SEB 2022. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 336. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8769-4_1

Download citation