This is the latest version of this item.

Abstract

Plato’s Phaedrus, one of his most enigmatic and structurally convoluted dialogues, could easily be said to inaugurate a pointed critique of mass media that persists to the present day. Indeed, in certain corners of media theory, the origin myth of writing furnished in the Phaedrus (in which the Egyptian god Theuth presents writing as a gift to King Thamus) has in turn come to serve as a kind of origin myth for media theory: a primaeval pharmacopoeia of media effects. And yet, this is an origin myth that can only underwrite not only its own non-originarity and non-truth, insofar as its very status as a written text ensures that it will never meet the criteria that it itself establishes for a reasoned account of things (logos). It remains perpetually orphaned, unable to defend itself, irrevocably cut off from its ‘father’, the speaking subject, and thus from the vitality of living discourse. But this paradox, I argue, is not a failing of the dialogue, but is a device intended to encourage the reader’s active involvement in the text’s status as medium. The Phaedrus is not just diagnostic, but therapeutic.

Available Versions of this Item

• Plato’s prescription: The origin myth of media theory. (deposited 11 Apr 2022 11:10)
  • Plato’s prescription: The origin myth of media theory. (deposited 20 Dec 2022 16:44) [Currently Displayed]