Locatelli, Giorgio and Mancini, Mauro (2011) Large and small baseload power plants: drivers to define the optimal portfolios. Energy Policy, 39 (12). pp. 7762-7775. ISSN 0301-4215
Full content URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.09.022
Documents |
|
| ||||||||
|
![]() |
Microsoft Word
Inviato_correz_gram_V06.docx - Whole Document Restricted to Repository staff only 858kB | |
![]() |
PDF
Inviato_correz_gram_V06.pdf - Whole Document Restricted to Repository staff only 894kB | |
![]() |
PDF
Large_and_small_baseload_power_plants_finale.pdf - Whole Document Restricted to Repository staff only 994kB |
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Item Status: | Live Archive |
Abstract
Despite the growing interest in Small Medium sized Power Plants (SMPP) international literature provides only studies related to portfolios of large plants in infinite markets/grids with no particular attention given to base load SMPP. This paper aims to fill this gap, investigating the attractiveness of SMPP portfolios respect to large power plant portfolios. The analysis includes Nuclear, Coal and Combined Cycle Gas Turbines (CCGT) of different plant sizes. The Mean Variance Portfolio theory (MVP) is used to define the best portfolio according to IRR (Internal Rate of Return) and LUEC (Levelised Unit Electricity Cost) considering the life cycle costs of each power plant, Carbon Tax, Electricity Price and grid dimension.
The results show how large plants are the best option for large grids, while SMPP are as competitive as large plants in small grids. In fact, in order to achieve the highest profitability with the lowest risk it is necessary to build several types of different plants and, in case of small grids, this is possible only with SMPP. A further result is the application of the framework to European OECD countries and the United States assessing their portfolios.
Additional Information: | Despite the growing interest in Small Medium sized Power Plants (SMPP) international literature provides only studies related to portfolios of large plants in infinite markets/grids with no particular attention given to base load SMPP. This paper aims to fill this gap, investigating the attractiveness of SMPP portfolios respect to large power plant portfolios. The analysis includes Nuclear, Coal and Combined Cycle Gas Turbines (CCGT) of different plant sizes. The Mean Variance Portfolio theory (MVP) is used to define the best portfolio according to IRR (Internal Rate of Return) and LUEC (Levelised Unit Electricity Cost) considering the life cycle costs of each power plant, Carbon Tax, Electricity Price and grid dimension. The results show how large plants are the best option for large grids, while SMPP are as competitive as large plants in small grids. In fact, in order to achieve the highest profitability with the lowest risk it is necessary to build several types of different plants and, in case of small grids, this is possible only with SMPP. A further result is the application of the framework to European OECD countries and the United States assessing their portfolios. |
---|---|
Keywords: | Grid dimension, Small power plants, Portfolio analysis |
Subjects: | H Engineering > H821 Nuclear Engineering J Technologies > J910 Energy Technologies H Engineering > H221 Energy Resources |
Divisions: | College of Science > School of Engineering |
ID Code: | 5093 |
Deposited On: | 25 Apr 2012 10:15 |
Repository Staff Only: item control page