The effects of concurrent biomechanical biofeedback on rowing performance at different stroke rates

Gorman, Anthony, Willmott, Sandy and Mullineaux, David (2021) The effects of concurrent biomechanical biofeedback on rowing performance at different stroke rates. Journal of Sports Sciences . ISSN 0264-0414

Full content URL: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02640...

Documents
The effects of concurrent biomechanical biofeedback on rowing performance at different stroke rates
Authors' Accepted Manuscript
The effects of concurrent biomechanical biofeedback on rowing performance at different stroke rates
Published Open Access manuscript
[img]
[Download]
[img] PDF
Gorman et al (2021) The effects of concurrent biomechanical biofeedback on rowing performance at different stroke rates.pdf - Whole Document
Restricted to Repository staff only until 18 July 2022.

1MB
[img]
Preview
PDF
02640414.2021.pdf - Whole Document
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.

3MB
Item Type:Article
Item Status:Live Archive

Abstract

The aims of this study were to assess the effects of stroke rate (SR) on the ability of trained rowers to: a) comply with concurrent biomechanical biofeedback on knee-back-elbow joint sequencing; and b) transfer any changes to competition-intensity conditions (maximal rowing task). Following a five-minute maximal rowing task (Baseline), 30 trained rowers were randomised to four groups. Two groups rowed at high SRs (90% maximum SR with biofeedback (BFb90) or control), while others rowed at low SRs (60% maximum SR with biofeedback (BFb60) or control) for 3 sessions. All rowers then completed another maximal rowing task (Transfer). Rowers complied with the biofeedback at both SRs, which promoted coordinative changes to knee-elbow motions during the pull. During Transfer, control rowers did not improve whereas those receiving biofeedback covered significantly greater distances (increase from Baseline: BFb60 = 6 ± 5%; BFb90 = 5 ± 4%; p < 0.05). However, movement adaptations were temporally different between SRs and were better maintained into Transfer by those that rowed at higher rates. This indicated biofeedback specificity, as transference of modified movement patterns appeared better when acquisition and transfer conditions were similar. These findings have practical implications for assimilating biofeedback into training programmes.

Keywords:CI2, coordination, feedback, real-time, training
Subjects:C Biological Sciences > C600 Sports Science
Divisions:College of Social Science > School of Sport and Exercise Science
ID Code:45826
Deposited On:27 Jul 2021 11:13

Repository Staff Only: item control page