Iqbal, Mohammad, Spaight, Anne, Siriwardena, A. Niroshan and Shaw, Deborah (2011) Investigation of patient and practitioner views on improving pain management in the prehospital setting. Emergency Medicine Journal, 28 (3e). p. 1. ISSN 1472-0205
Full content URL: http://emj.bmj.com/content/28/3/e1.12.abstract
| Documents |
| ||||||
![[img]](http://eprints.lincoln.ac.uk/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png) |
PDF
Iqbal_Investigation_of_patient_and_practitioner_views_on_improving_pain_management_in_the_prehospital_setting_[abstract]_EMJ_2011.pdf - Abstract Restricted to Repository staff only until 31 December 2099. 59kB |
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Item Status: | Live Archive |
Abstract
Background: Pre-hospital pain management is increasingly important with most patients (80%) presenting to UK ambulance services in pain. Around 20% of patients want more pain relief and 5% feel that ambulance crews do not adequately treat pain. A recent study in the East Midlands showed that 85.1% of AMI patients and 75% of fracture patients had a pain score but fewer than a quarter of patients assessed for and experiencing pain with either condition received opiates. Improving the pathway of prehospital pain management is therefore important and a key indicator of the quality of service.
Objective: We gathered data on perspectives of pain management from patients, ambulance and accident and emergency (A&E) care staff in Lincolnshire.
Method: Qualitative data were gathered through focus group (5) and interviews (28). Participants were purposively sampled from patients recently transported to hospital with pain, ambulance staff and A&E clinicians. Interviews were audiotaped and transcribed. Data were manipulated using MAXQDA and thematic analysis used iteratively to develop themes.
Results: Themes emerging from the data included: (a) expectations and beliefs (b) assessment methods (c) drug treatment (d) non-drug treatment and (e) improvement strategies for pain. Patients and staff expected pain to be relieved in the ambulance; instances of refusal or inadequate analgesia were not uncommon. Pain was commonly assessed using a verbal pain score; clinical observation
was also used which sometimes led to discordance between
subjective experience and clinical assessment. Morphine, Entonox and oxygen were commonly used to treat pain. Reassurance, positioning and immobilisation were alternatives to drugs. Suggestions to improve prehospital pain management included addressing barriers, modifying the available drugs and developing a prehospital pain management protocol supported by training for staff.
Conclusion: The findings will be used to develop an educational intervention for better pain assessment and management in the prehospital setting.
| Additional Information: | Background: Pre-hospital pain management is increasingly important with most patients (80%) presenting to UK ambulance services in pain. Around 20% of patients want more pain relief and 5% feel that ambulance crews do not adequately treat pain. A recent study in the East Midlands showed that 85.1% of AMI patients and 75% of fracture patients had a pain score but fewer than a quarter of patients assessed for and experiencing pain with either condition received opiates. Improving the pathway of prehospital pain management is therefore important and a key indicator of the quality of service. Objective: We gathered data on perspectives of pain management from patients, ambulance and accident and emergency (A&E) care staff in Lincolnshire. Method: Qualitative data were gathered through focus group (5) and interviews (28). Participants were purposively sampled from patients recently transported to hospital with pain, ambulance staff and A&E clinicians. Interviews were audiotaped and transcribed. Data were manipulated using MAXQDA and thematic analysis used iteratively to develop themes. Results: Themes emerging from the data included: (a) expectations and beliefs (b) assessment methods (c) drug treatment (d) non-drug treatment and (e) improvement strategies for pain. Patients and staff expected pain to be relieved in the ambulance; instances of refusal or inadequate analgesia were not uncommon. Pain was commonly assessed using a verbal pain score; clinical observation was also used which sometimes led to discordance between subjective experience and clinical assessment. Morphine, Entonox and oxygen were commonly used to treat pain. Reassurance, positioning and immobilisation were alternatives to drugs. Suggestions to improve prehospital pain management included addressing barriers, modifying the available drugs and developing a prehospital pain management protocol supported by training for staff. Conclusion: The findings will be used to develop an educational intervention for better pain assessment and management in the prehospital setting. |
|---|---|
| Keywords: | prehospital, ambulance, paramedic, quality improvement, pain, analgesia |
| Subjects: | B Subjects allied to Medicine > B990 Subjects Allied to Medicine not elsewhere classified A Medicine and Dentistry > A300 Clinical Medicine |
| Divisions: | College of Social Science > School of Health & Social Care |
| ID Code: | 4200 |
| Deposited On: | 17 Mar 2011 08:55 |
Repository Staff Only: item control page