Bal, Matthijs
(2020)
Why we should stop measuring performance and well-being.
Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 64
(3).
pp. 196-200.
ISSN 0932-4089
Full content URL: https://doi.org/10.1026/0932-4089/a000333
Why we should stop measuring performance and well-being | Author's Accepted Manuscript | | ![[img]](http://eprints.lincoln.ac.uk/40140/1.hassmallThumbnailVersion/Bal_2020_ZAO.pdf) [Download] |
|
![[img]](http://eprints.lincoln.ac.uk/40140/1.hassmallThumbnailVersion/Bal_2020_ZAO.pdf)  Preview |
|
PDF
Bal_2020_ZAO.pdf
- Whole Document
287kB |
Item Type: | Article |
---|
Item Status: | Live Archive |
---|
Abstract
In this essay, I argue that work and organizational psychology needs to move beyond measuring performance and well-being as the only outcomes relevant to our research. I outline the main difficulties with a narrow focus on performance and well-being, and argue that we need to broaden our scope of outcomes to stay relevant in a rapidly changing society. One example includes a dignity-paradigm, which postulates that there may be other outcomes in work and organizational psychology research which are relevant for both researchers, practitioners and society.
Repository Staff Only: item control page