Are Drosophila preferences for yeasts stable or contextual?

Gunther, Catrin, Knight, Sarah, Jones, Rory and Goddard, Matthew (2019) Are Drosophila preferences for yeasts stable or contextual? Ecology and Evolution, 9 (14). pp. 8075-8086. ISSN 2045-7758

Full content URL: http://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5366

Documents
Are Drosophila preferences for yeasts stable or contextual?
[img]
[Download]
Are Drosophila preferences for yeasts stable or contextual?
[img]
[Download]
[img] PDF
EcoEVO_FruitFlyREV2.pdf - Whole Document
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.

4MB
[img] PDF
G-nther_et_al-2019-Ecology_and_Evolution.pdf - Whole Document
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.

762kB
Item Type:Article
Item Status:Live Archive

Abstract

Whether there are general mechanisms, driving interspecific chemical communica‐ tion is uncertain. Saccharomycetaceae yeast and Drosophila fruit flies, both extensively studied research models, share the same fruit habitat, and it has been suggested their interaction comprises a facultative mutualism that is instigated and maintained by yeast volatiles. Using choice tests, experimental evolution, and volatile analyses, we investigate the maintenance of this relationship and reveal little consistency be‐ tween behavioral responses of two isolates of sympatric Drosophila species. While D. melanogaster was attracted to a range of different Saccharomycetaceae yeasts and this was independent of fruit type, D. simulans preference appeared specific to a par‐ ticular S. cerevisiae genotype isolated from a vineyard fly population. This response, however, was not consistent across fruit types and is therefore context‐dependent. In addition, D. simulans attraction to an individual S. cerevisiae isolate was pliable over ecological timescales. Volatile candidates were analyzed to identify a common signal for yeast attraction, and while D. melanogaster generally responded to fermentation profiles, D. simulans preference was more discerning and likely threshold‐dependent. Overall, there is no strong evidence to support the idea of bespoke interactions with specific yeasts for either of these Drosophila genotypes. Rather the data support the idea Drosophila are generally adapted to sense and locate fruits infested by a range of fungal microbes and/or that yeast–Drosophila interactions may evolve rapidly.

Keywords:chemical communication, Drosophila, fruit, mutualism, Saccharomycetaceae, yeast
Subjects:C Biological Sciences > C500 Microbiology
C Biological Sciences > C180 Ecology
Divisions:College of Science > School of Life Sciences
ID Code:38686
Deposited On:05 Nov 2019 10:25

Repository Staff Only: item control page