Emergence, Dependence, and Fundamentality

Pearson, Olley (2018) Emergence, Dependence, and Fundamentality. Erkenntnis, 83 (3). pp. 391-402. ISSN 0165-0106

Full content URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-017-9895-1

Emergence, Dependence, and Fundamentality
Published PDF
[img] PDF
Emergence-Dependence.pdf - Whole Document
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.

Item Type:Article
Item Status:Live Archive


In a recent paper Barnes proposes to characterize ontological emergence by identifying the emergent entities with those entities which are both fundamental and dependent. Barnes offers characterizations of the notions of fundamentality and dependence, but is cautious about committing to the specifics of these notions. This paper argues that Barnes’s characterization of emergence is problematic in several ways. Firstly, emergence is a relation, and merely delimiting relata of this relation tells us little about it. Secondly, the group of entities delimited as dependent and fundamental do not appear to be the group of emergent entities. Rather, some entities appear to be dependent and fundamental and not emergent, whilst other entities appear to be emergent and not dependent and fundamental. The moral drawn is that in order to provide a characterization of emergence one must go beyond what Barnes says explicitly. It is also shown that a potentially fruitful way of doing this would be to further specify the notion of dependence at issue revealing it to be asymmetric and perhaps merely nomological.

Subjects:V Historical and Philosophical studies > V500 Philosophy
Divisions:College of Arts
ID Code:36691
Deposited On:23 Aug 2019 09:10

Repository Staff Only: item control page