No Pets Allowed? Companion Animals, Older People and Residential Care

Fox, Marie and Ray, Mo (2019) No Pets Allowed? Companion Animals, Older People and Residential Care. Medical Humanities, 45 (2). ISSN 1468-215X

Full content URL:

This is the latest version of this item.


Request a copy
No Pets Allowed? Companion Animals, Older People and Residential Care
Accepted Manuscript
[img] PDF
Restricted to Repository staff only

[img] Microsoft Word
Fox_Ray_Medical_Humanities_2019_MAIN_DOCUMENT_REVISED_SUBMITTED_5_APRILAUTHORS ACCEPTED.docx - Whole Document

Item Type:Article
Item Status:Live Archive


This article is concerned with a particular site of inter-species relationships. Using the lens of liminality, it examines forced separation of older people from their companion animals when they move to a residential or nursing home in the UK. Such residential spaces frequently either exclude companion animals or fail to make adequate provision for them to accompany their owners. We see such separation as a major bereavement for an older person at a stage of life when they experience significant other losses, and suggest it is often experienced as akin to the loss of a family member. We deploy vulnerability theory to argue that exclusion of companion animals from care spaces exemplifies a failure to understand the relational vulnerabilities of older age and the significance of animal companionship in mitigating those vulnerabilities. Equally, such separation fails to recognise the implications for excluded animals who can end up in unsuitable homes, being signed over to already over-stretched animal rescues or euthanised. Vulnerability theory highlights how companion species are always already vulnerable given their liminal position between person and property, while older people are rendered particularly vulnerable in the ‘liminal zone’ of the care home, denied the ability to shape their environment, control their private space or form/sustain relationships of their own choosing. The article explores the potential of law to respond to and mitigate these shared vulnerabilities, suggesting that human rights arguments grounded in shared vulnerability may be invoked to argue for a definition of the family to recognise the significance of the human-animal relationship. We draw on the reasoning in a recent Court of Protection case which hints at law’s ability to recognise the value of interspecies relations and their role in sustaining health and wellbeing, and the ability to live well in old age.

Keywords:older people, care homes, pets, companion animals, human rights
Subjects:D Veterinary Sciences, Agriculture and related subjects > D320 Animal Health
L Social studies > L432 Welfare Policy
L Social studies > L510 Health & Welfare
Divisions:College of Social Science > School of Health & Social Care
ID Code:36299
Deposited On:07 Aug 2019 15:10

Available Versions of this Item

Repository Staff Only: item control page