Coster, Joanne, O'Cathain, Alicia, Jacques, Richard , Crum, Annabel, Siriwardena, A. Niroshan and Turner, Janette (2019) Outcomes for patients who contact the emergency ambulance service and are not transported to the Emergency Department: a data linkage study. Prehospital Emergency Care, 23 (4). pp. 566-577. ISSN 1090-3127
Full content URL: http://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2018.1549628
Documents |
|
![]() |
PDF
Coster Outcomes for patients who contact PEC 2019.pdf - Whole Document Available under License Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International. 763kB |
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Item Status: | Live Archive |
Abstract
Objectives: Emergency ambulance services do not transport all patients to hospital. International literature reports non-transport rates ranging from 3.7–93.7%. In 2017, 38% of the 11 million calls received by ambulance services in England were attended by ambulance but not transported to an Emergency Department (ED). A further 10% received clinical advice over the telephone. Little is known about what happens to patients following a non-transport decision. We aimed to investigate what happens to patients following an emergency ambulance telephone call that resulted in a non-transport decision, using a linked routine data-set.
Methods: Six-months individual patient level data from one ambulance service in England, linked with Hospital Episode Statistics and national mortality data, were used to identify subsequent health events (ambulance re-contact, ED attendance, hospital admission, death) within 3 days (primary analysis) and 7 days (secondary analysis) of an ambulance call ending in non-transport to hospital. Non-clinical staff used a priority dispatch system e.g. Medical Priority Dispatch System to prioritize calls for ambulance dispatch. Non-transport to ED was determined by ambulance crew members at scene or clinicians at the emergency operating center when an ambulance was not dispatched (telephone advice).
Results: The data linkage rate was 85% for patients who were discharged at scene (43,108/50,894). After removal of deaths associated with end of life care (N = 312), 9% (3,861/42,796) re-contacted the ambulance service, 12.6% (5,412/42,796) attended ED, 6.3% (2,694/42,796) were admitted to hospital, and 0.3% (129/42,796) died within 3 days of the call. Rates were higher for events occurring within 7 days. For example, 12% re-contacted the ambulance service, 16.1% attended ED, 9.3% were admitted to hospital, and 0.5% died. The linkage rate for telephone advice calls was low because ambulance services record less information about these patients (24% 2,514/10,634). A sensitivity analysis identified a range of subsequent event rates: 2.5–10.5% of patients were admitted to hospital and 0.06–0.24% of patient died within 3 days of the call.
Conclusions: Most non-transported patients did not have subsequent health events. Deaths after non-transport are an infrequent event that could be selected for more detailed review of individual cases, to facilitate learning and improvement.
Keywords: | non-transport, patient outcomes, patient safety, ambulance, prehospital care |
---|---|
Subjects: | B Subjects allied to Medicine > B990 Subjects Allied to Medicine not elsewhere classified A Medicine and Dentistry > A300 Clinical Medicine B Subjects allied to Medicine > B780 Paramedical Nursing |
Divisions: | College of Social Science > School of Health & Social Care |
ID Code: | 34661 |
Deposited On: | 28 Jan 2019 16:38 |
Repository Staff Only: item control page