Binch, Adam and Fox, Charles
(2017)
Controlled comparison of machine vision algorithms for Rumex and Urtica detection in grassland.
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 140
.
pp. 123-138.
ISSN 0168-1699
Full content URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2017.05.018
Controlled comparison of machine vision algorithms for Rumex and Urtica detection in grassland | | ![[img]](http://eprints.lincoln.ac.uk/32031/1.hassmallThumbnailVersion/FoxBinch2017WeedsIbex.pdf) [Download] |
|
![[img]](http://eprints.lincoln.ac.uk/32031/1.hassmallThumbnailVersion/FoxBinch2017WeedsIbex.pdf)  Preview |
|
PDF
FoxBinch2017WeedsIbex.pdf
- Whole Document
12MB |
Item Type: | Article |
---|
Item Status: | Live Archive |
---|
Abstract
Automated robotic weeding of grassland will improve the productivity of dairy and sheep farms
7 while helping to conserve their environments. Previous studies have reported results of machine
8 vision methods to separate grass from grassland weeds but each use their own datasets and
9 report only performance of their own algorithm, making it impossible to compare them. A
10 definitive, large-scale independent study is presented of all major known grassland weed detec-
11 tion methods evaluated on a new standardised data set under a wider range of environment
12 conditions. This allows for a fair, unbiased, independent and statistically significant comparison
13 of these and future methods for the first time. We test features including linear binary pat-
14 terns, BRISK, Fourier and Watershed; and classifiers including support vector machines, linear
15 discriminants, nearest neighbour, and meta-classifier combinations. The most accurate method
16 is found to use linear binary patterns together with a support vector machine
Repository Staff Only: item control page