Alexandris Polomarkakis, Konstantinos (2017) A tale of two approaches to Social Europe: the CJEU and the Advocate General drifting apart in Case C-201/15 AGET Iraklis. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 24 (3). pp. 424-437. ISSN 1023-263X
| Documents |
| ||||
![[img]](http://eprints.lincoln.ac.uk/style/images/fileicons/application_msword.png) |
Microsoft Word
Final 24.5._CASE_NOTE_Polomarkakis_edited.docx - Whole Document 53kB |
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Item Status: | Live Archive |
Abstract
Extended case note on Case C-201/15 AGET Iraklis, EU:C:2016:972.
| Keywords: | EU law, CJEU, ECJ, Social Europe, Collective Redundancies |
|---|---|
| Subjects: | M Law > M120 European Union Law M Law > M100 Law by area M Law > M200 Law by Topic |
| Divisions: | College of Social Science > Lincoln Law School |
| Related URLs: | |
| ID Code: | 31653 |
| Deposited On: | 17 Apr 2018 11:45 |
Repository Staff Only: item control page