A tale of two approaches to Social Europe: the CJEU and the Advocate General drifting apart in Case C-201/15 AGET Iraklis

Alexandris Polomarkakis, Konstantinos (2017) A tale of two approaches to Social Europe: the CJEU and the Advocate General drifting apart in Case C-201/15 AGET Iraklis. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 24 (3). pp. 424-437. ISSN 1023-263X

Documents
Final 24.5._CASE_NOTE_Polomarkakis_edited.docx
[img]
[Download]
[img] Microsoft Word
Final 24.5._CASE_NOTE_Polomarkakis_edited.docx - Whole Document

53kB
Item Type:Article
Item Status:Live Archive

Abstract

Extended case note on Case C-201/15 AGET Iraklis, EU:C:2016:972.

Keywords:EU law, CJEU, ECJ, Social Europe, Collective Redundancies
Subjects:M Law > M120 European Union Law
M Law > M100 Law by area
M Law > M200 Law by Topic
Divisions:College of Social Science > Lincoln Law School
Related URLs:
ID Code:31653
Deposited On:17 Apr 2018 11:45

Repository Staff Only: item control page