Boardman, Katie and Bartels, Ross
(2018)
Using video stimuli to examine judgments of non-offending and offending pedophiles: a brief communication.
Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 44
(4).
pp. 333-342.
ISSN 0092-623X
Using video stimuli to examine judgments of non-offending and offending pedophiles: A brief communication | | ![[img]](http://eprints.lincoln.ac.uk/29618/1.hassmallThumbnailVersion/Using%20video%20stimuli%20to%20examine%20judgments%20of%20NOPs%20%26%20OPs%20-%20brief%20comm%20%28Boardman%20%26%20Bartels%2C%202017%29.pdf) [Download] |
|
![[img]](http://eprints.lincoln.ac.uk/29618/1.hassmallThumbnailVersion/Using%20video%20stimuli%20to%20examine%20judgments%20of%20NOPs%20%26%20OPs%20-%20brief%20comm%20%28Boardman%20%26%20Bartels%2C%202017%29.pdf)  Preview |
|
PDF
Using video stimuli to examine judgments of NOPs & OPs - brief comm (Boardman & Bartels, 2017).pdf
- Whole Document
398kB |
Item Type: | Article |
---|
Item Status: | Live Archive |
---|
Abstract
In this experimental study, 89 participants were allocated to an offending pedophile, nonoffending pedophile, or control video condition. They then watched two short help-seeking video clips of an older male and a younger male (counterbalanced). Judgments about each male were assessed, as were general attitudes toward pedophiles and sexual offenders. Offending pedophiles were judged as more deserving of punishment than the nonoffending pedophiles and controls. Age of the male was found to have an effect on judgments of dangerousness. Existing attitudes toward pedophiles and sexual offenders did not statistically differ. Limitations and future research ideas are discussed.
Repository Staff Only: item control page