Bates, Stephen, Goodwin, Mark and McKay, Steve
(2017)
Everyone loves select committees these days, but have they really changed?
Democratic Audit.
Full content URL: http://www.democraticaudit.com/2017/11/10/everyone...
democraticaudit.com-Everyone loves select committees these days But have they really changed.pdf | | ![[img]](http://eprints.lincoln.ac.uk/29523/1.hassmallThumbnailVersion/democraticaudit.com-Everyone%20loves%20select%20committees%20these%20days%20But%20have%20they%20really%20changed.pdf) [Download] |
|
![[img]](http://eprints.lincoln.ac.uk/29523/1.hassmallThumbnailVersion/democraticaudit.com-Everyone%20loves%20select%20committees%20these%20days%20But%20have%20they%20really%20changed.pdf)  Preview |
|
PDF
democraticaudit.com-Everyone loves select committees these days But have they really changed.pdf
- Whole Document
107kB |
Item Type: | Other |
---|
Item Status: | Live Archive |
---|
Abstract
The Wright reforms have been widely credited with reinvigorating select committees. Stephen Bates, Mark Goodwin (University of Birmingham) and Steve McKay (University of Lincoln) take issue with this assumption. They found the reforms have made little or no difference to MP turnover and attendance, which are driven by the parliamentary cycle. When MPs are jostling for payroll vote positions and trying to keep up with constituency duties and votes in the Chamber, select committees are likely to suffer.
Repository Staff Only: item control page