Cooper, Nathan John (2017) After Mazibuko: exploring the responses of communities excluded from South Africa’s water experiment. Journal of African Law, 61 (1). pp. 57-81. ISSN 0021-8553
Full content URL: http://doi.org/10.1017/s0021855317000055
Documents |
|
|
PDF
25992 Cooper JAL After Mazibuko 16 January 2017.pdf - Whole Document 531kB |
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Item Status: | Live Archive |
Abstract
Despite a constitutional right to water, challenges remain for access to sufficient water in South Africa. This article considers the degree to which current legal provisions perpetuate approaches, which are antithetical to genuinely eco-socio-sustainable water access. Water in South Africa has largely been re-cast as a commodity, exposed to market rules, proving problematic for many and giving rise to various responses, including litigation. In the seminal case of Mazibuko the Constitutional Court failed to provide robust protection to the right to water, providing impetus for the formation of “commons” strategies for water allocation. Indeed “commoning” is beginning to represent not only an emerging conceptual strand in urban resource allocation, but also a dynamic, contemporary, eco-sensitive, socio-cultural phenomenon, driving innovative, interactive and inclusive forms of planning and social engagement. Against the backdrop of unequal water access, commoning offers glimpses of an empowering and enfranchising subaltern paradigm.
Keywords: | South Africa, Water |
---|---|
Subjects: | F Physical Sciences > F810 Environmental Geography M Law > M200 Law by Topic |
Divisions: | College of Social Science > Lincoln Law School |
Related URLs: | |
ID Code: | 25992 |
Deposited On: | 03 Feb 2017 10:05 |
Repository Staff Only: item control page