Heflick, Nathan A. and Goldenberg,, Jamie L. (2012) No atheists in foxholes: arguments for (but not against) afterlife belief buffers mortality salience effects for atheists. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51 (2). pp. 385-392. ISSN 0144-6665
Full content URL: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.2044-...
Documents |
|
![]() |
PDF
atheists_TMT (1).pdf - Whole Document Restricted to Repository staff only 124kB |
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Item Status: | Live Archive |
Abstract
Terror management theory (TMT) posits that people cope with mortality concerns
via symbolic immortality (e.g., secular cultural beliefs that outlast death) and/or
literal immortality (afterlife belief). However, what happens when these two forms
of immortality conflict, as in atheism? Would atheists’ mortality concerns be better
assuaged by affirming an afterlife, or by affirming their literal immortality-denying
worldview? Drawing on an untested TMT hypothesis, we predicted that atheists would
be buffered from mortality concerns if their atheistic worldview – no life after death –
was challenged, but not if it was supported. Results confirmed the hypothesis and were
also found for theists and agnostics. These findings support TMT’s claim that literal
immortality is of paramount importance in ameliorating death concerns.
Keywords: | mortality salience, atheism, worldview defense, religious belief |
---|---|
Subjects: | C Biological Sciences > C880 Social Psychology |
Divisions: | College of Social Science > School of Psychology |
ID Code: | 18885 |
Deposited On: | 30 Sep 2015 14:23 |
Repository Staff Only: item control page