Measuring Adherence to Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines

Clark, Richard, Tonmukayakul, Utsana, Mangan, Yvonne , Smith, Michael, Gussy, Mark, Manton, David, Bailey, Denise and Calache, Hanny (2017) Measuring Adherence to Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Journal of Evidence Based Dental Practice . ISSN 1532-3382

Full content URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebdp.2017.05.001

Full text not available from this repository.

Item Type:Article
Item Status:Live Archive

Abstract

Dental Health Services Victoria publishes evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) to assist public oral health practitioners to provide high-quality dental care. How well these CPGs are implemented into practice is unknown. The aim of this study was to assess adherence to selected CPGs.

Methods
An electronic auditing tool was developed using clinical indicators derived for “stainless steel crown (SSC),” “restorative care for children under general anesthetic (GA),” and “direct restorative materials” CPG. Six trained dentists audited a random sample of 204 dental records of children aged 3-12 years from 2 major public dental agencies.

Results
In total, 319 material-based treatments were audited, comprising 170 resin composite, 81 glass ionomer cement, 64 SSC, and 4 amalgam restorations. Adherence to the current guidelines varied from 94% of the SSC to none of the amalgam treatments audited. Almost half (47%) of the resin composite restorations and 5% of glass ionomer cement restorations were nonadherent to the relevant guideline.

Conclusions
Average adherence was up to 72% of cases. Clinicians need to consider recording the rationale upon which their professional judgment is based when they decide not to follow an appropriate CPG.

Divisions:College of Social Science > Lincoln Institute of Health
ID Code:38208
Deposited On:29 Oct 2019 09:44

Repository Staff Only: item control page