Ethical analysis in HTA of complex health interventions

Lysdahl, Kristin Bakke, Oortwijn, Wija, van der Wilt, Gert Jan, Refolo, Pietro, Sacchini,, Dario, Mozygemba,, Kati, Gerhardus, Ansgar, Brereton, Louise, Brnneke, Jan and Hofmann, Bjorn (2016) Ethical analysis in HTA of complex health interventions. BMC Medical Ethics, 17 (16). pp. 1-15. ISSN 1472-6939

Full content URL: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-016-0099-z

Documents
Ethical Analysis in HTA of Complex Health Interventions
Published paper
[img]
[Download]
[img]
Preview
PDF
Lysdahl et al (2016) Ethical analysis in HTA of complex health interventions .pdf - Whole Document
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.

552kB
Item Type:Article
Item Status:Live Archive

Abstract

Background: In the field of health technology assessment (HTA), there are several approaches that can be used for ethical analysis. However, there is a scarcity of literature that critically evaluates and compares the strength and weaknesses of these approaches when they are applied in practice. In this paper, we analyse the applicability of some selected approaches for addressing ethical issues in HTA in the field of complex health interventions. Complex health interventions have been the focus of methodological attention in HTA. However, the potential methodological challenges for ethical analysis are as yet unknown. Methods: Six of the most frequently described and applied ethical approaches in HTA were critically assessed against a set of five characteristics of complex health interventions: multiple and changing perspectives, indeterminate phenomena, uncertain causality, unpredictable outcomes, and ethical complexity. The assessments are based on literature and the authors’ experiences of developing, applying and assessing the approaches. Results: The Interactive, participatory HTA approach is by its nature and flexibility, applicable across most complexity characteristics. Wide Reflective Equilibrium is also flexible and its openness to different perspectives makes it better suited for complex health interventions than more rigid conventional approaches, such as Principlism and Casuistry. Approaches developed for HTA purposes are fairly applicable for complex health interventions, which one could expect because they include various ethical perspectives, such as the HTA Core Model® and the Socratic approach. Conclusion: This study shows how the applicability for addressing ethical issues in HTA of complex health interventions differs between the selected ethical approaches. Knowledge about these differences may be helpful when choosing and applying an approach for ethical analyses in HTA. We believe that the study contributes to increasing awareness and interest of the ethical aspects of complex health interventions in general.

Keywords:Health technology assessment, bioethics, complex health intervention, JCOpen
Subjects:B Subjects allied to Medicine > B700 Nursing
Divisions:College of Social Science > School of Health & Social Care
Related URLs:
ID Code:26366
Deposited On:07 Feb 2017 20:25

Repository Staff Only: item control page