What do users value about the emergency ambulance service?

Togher, Fiona and Phung, Viet-Hai and Turner, Janette and Siriwardena, A. Niroshan and O'Cathain, Alicia (2013) What do users value about the emergency ambulance service? Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, 28 (Supp.1). S53-S53. ISSN 1049-023X

Full content URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X13004998

Documents
What do service users value about the emergency ambulance service?
[img]
[Download]
[img]
Preview
PDF
PhOEBEqualWCDEM13final.pdf - Presentation
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

794kB
Item Type:Article
Item Status:Live Archive

Abstract

Introduction: Response times have been used as a key quality indicator for emergency ambulance services in the United Kingdom, but criticised for their narrow focus. Consequently, there is a need to consider wider measures of quality. The patient perspective is becoming an increasingly important dimension in pre-hospital outcomes research. To that end, we aimed to investigate patients’ experiences of the 999 ambulance service to understand the processes and outcomes important to them.
Methods: We employed a qualitative design, using semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of people who had recently used a 999 ambulance in the East Midlands region of the UK. We recruited patients of different age, sex, geographical location, and ambulance service response including ‘hear and treat’, ‘see and treat’ and ‘see and convey’.
Results: We interviewed 20 service users. Eleven men and nine women participated and twelve were aged 65 years and over. Users valued a quick response when they perceived the call to be an emergency. This was of less value to those who did not perceive their situation as an emergency and irrelevant to ‘hear and treat’ users. All users valued the professional approach and information and advice given by call handlers, crew and first responders, which provided them with reassurance in a worrying situation. ‘See and convey’ users valued a seamless handover to secondary care.
Conclusions: Aspects other than response times were important to patients, particularly in situations perceived by patients to be non-emergency. We found it challenging to engage participants to consider quality indicators beyond response times because these were considered to be abstract in comparison with their concrete experiences. The results will be combined with issues identified from systematic reviews and used in a Delphi study to identify candidates for new outcome measures for emergency ambulance services.

Additional Information:World Congress on Disaster and Emergency Medicine, 30th May 2013
Keywords:Emergency Medical Systems, ambulance services, service user views, qualitative research, bmjdoi
Subjects:B Subjects allied to Medicine > B990 Subjects Allied to Medicine not elsewhere classified
A Medicine and Dentistry > A300 Clinical Medicine
Divisions:College of Social Science > School of Health & Social Care
ID Code:9693
Deposited On:03 Jun 2013 07:55

Repository Staff Only: item control page