What do users value about the emergency ambulance service?

Togher, Fiona and Phung, Viet-Hai and Turner, Janette and Siriwardena, A. Niroshan and O'Cathain, Alicia (2013) What do users value about the emergency ambulance service? In: Making an Impact: what's new in emergency prehospital care research?, 27 February 2013, Novotel, Cardiff.

Documents
What do users value about the emergency ambulance service?
Poster
[img]
[Download]
[img]
Preview
PDF
999EMSPhOEBEqualposter.pdf - Whole Document
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.

252kB
Item Type:Conference or Workshop contribution (Poster)
Item Status:Live Archive

Abstract

Introduction: Response times have been used as a key quality indicator for emergency ambulance services in the United Kingdom, but criticised for their narrow focus. Consequently, there is a need to consider wider measures of quality. The patient perspective is becoming an increasingly important dimension in pre-hospital outcomes research. To that end, we aimed to investigate patients’ experiences of the 999 ambulance service to understand the processes and outcomes important to them.
Methods: We employed a qualitative design, using semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of people who had recently used a 999 ambulance in the East Midlands. We recruited patients of different age, sex, geographical location, and ambulance service response including ‘hear and treat’, ‘see and treat’ and ‘see and convey’.
Results: We interviewed 20 service users. Eleven men and nine women participated and 12 were aged 65 years and over. Users valued a quick response when they perceived the call to be an emergency. This was of less value to those who did not perceive their situation as an emergency and irrelevant to ‘hear and treat’ users. All users valued the professional approach and information and advice given by call handlers, crew and first responders, which provided them with reassurance in a worrying situation. ‘See and convey’ users valued a seamless handover to secondary care.
Limitations: We found it challenging to engage participants to consider quality indicators beyond response times because these were considered to be abstract in comparison with their concrete experiences.
Conclusions and recommendations: Aspects other than response times were important to patients, particularly in situations perceived by patients to be non-emergency. The results will be combined with issues identified from systematic reviews and used in a Delphi study to identify candidates for new outcome measures for emergency ambulance services.

Keywords:Emergency Medical Systems, ambulance services, service user views, qualitative research
Subjects:B Subjects allied to Medicine > B990 Subjects Allied to Medicine not elsewhere classified
A Medicine and Dentistry > A300 Clinical Medicine
Divisions:College of Social Science > School of Health & Social Care
ID Code:7804
Deposited On:03 Mar 2013 19:20

Repository Staff Only: item control page