Mather, George and Daniell, Andrew K. (2005) No effect of spatial phase randomisation on direction discrimination in dense random element patterns. Vision Research, 45 (6). pp. 759-764. ISSN 0042-6989
Mather_Daniell_2005.pdf - Whole Document
Restricted to Repository staff only
Full text URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S...
Two computational strategies have been proposed for motion analysis in the human visual system. Energy-based schemes involve detection of spatiotemporal Fourier energyin the frequencycomponents comprising a moving pattern. Edge-based schemes track shifts in the position of local edges in the pattern over time. This paper describes a stimulus manipulation, spatial phase randomisation, that acts as a diagnostic test for the involvement of energy-based processes, and describes the results of two experiments
which applythe manipulation to random element patterns. Both experiments compared direction discrimination performance in patterns before and after the spatial phase of their components was randomised in the Fourier domain. For dense patterns, there was no effect of phase randomisation on the maximum displacement supporting reliable direction discrimination, indicating that energy-based responses were dominant. For sparse patterns, a significant effect of phase randomisation was obtained, indicating a greater role for edge-based responses.
|Keywords:||spatial phase randomisation, direction discrimination, Fourier analysis, Mathematical computing, Motion, Priority journal, Randomization, Visual system, Discrimination (psychology), Neurological models, Motion perception, Visual pattern recognition, Photic stimulation, Psychophysics, Random allocation|
|Subjects:||C Biological Sciences > C800 Psychology|
C Biological Sciences > C850 Cognitive Psychology
|Divisions:||College of Social Science > School of Psychology|
|Deposited By:||Alison Wilson|
|Deposited On:||13 Oct 2011 12:32|
|Last Modified:||08 Apr 2015 15:20|
Repository Staff Only: item control page