Apekey, Tanefa A. and McSorley, Gerry and Tilling, Michelle and Siriwardena, A. Niroshan (2011) Room for improvement? Leadership, innovation culture and uptake of quality improvement methods in general practice. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 17 (2). pp. 311-318. ISSN 1356-1294
Full content URL: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-...
This is the latest version of this item.
Apekey_GPqisurveyjecpfinalpostpeer.pdf - Whole Document
Restricted to Repository staff only until 2099.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.
|Item Status:||Live Archive|
Background: Leadership and innovation are currently seen as essential elements for the development and maintenance of high-quality care. Little is known about the relationship between leadership and culture of innovation and the extent to which quality improvement methods are used in general practice. This study aimed to assess the relationship between leadership behaviour, culture of innovation and adoption of quality improvement methods in general practice.
Method: Self-administered postal questionnaires were sent to general practitioner quality improvement leads in one county in the UK between June and December 2007. The questionnaire consisted of background information, a 12-item scale to assess leadership behaviour, a seven-dimension self-rating scale for culture of innovation and questions on current use of quality improvement tools and techniques.
Results: Sixty-three completed questionnaires (62%) were returned. Leadership behaviours were not commonly reported. Most practices reported a positive culture of innovation, featuring relationship most strongly, followed by targets and information but rated lower on other dimensions of rewards, risk and resources. There was a significant positive correlation between leadership behaviour and the culture of innovation (r = 0.57; P < 0.001). Apart from clinical audit and significant event analysis, quality improvement methods were not adopted by most participating practices.
Conclusions: Leadership behaviours were infrequently reported and this was associated with a limited culture of innovation in participating general practices. There was little use of quality improvement methods beyond clinical and significant event audit. Practices need support to enhance leadership skills, encourage innovation and develop quality improvement skills if improvements in health care are to accelerate.
|Keywords:||cross sectional studies, leadership, innovation, quality improvement, culture, general practice, primary care|
|Subjects:||A Medicine and Dentistry > A300 Clinical Medicine|
|Divisions:||College of Social Science > School of Health & Social Care|
|Deposited On:||14 Mar 2011 08:36|
Available Versions of this Item
Room for improvement? Leadership, innovation culture and uptake of quality improvement methods in general practice. (deposited 12 Dec 2010 22:01)
- Room for improvement? Leadership, innovation culture and uptake of quality improvement methods in general practice. (deposited 14 Mar 2011 08:36) [Currently Displayed]
Repository Staff Only: item control page