Comparing two measures of mental toughness

Crust, Lee and Swann, Christian (2011) Comparing two measures of mental toughness. Personality and Individual Differences, 50 (2). pp. 217-221. ISSN 0191-8869

[img]
Preview
PDF
MT_Measures_pdf.pdf - Whole Document

Download (132Kb)

Abstract

This paper tested relations between two measures of mental toughness. A sample of 110 male athletes (M age = 20.81 years; SD = 2.76), derived from University sports teams and local sports clubs, gave informed consent before completing two questionnaires to assess mental toughness. It was hypothesized that scales and subscales from the two different instruments, which purported to measure the same or substantially overlapping scales, would be strongly correlated. Predictions concerning the expected relations were made a priori. Pearson correlations revealed a significant and positive relationship between higher order mental toughness scores (r = .75; p <.001). Correlations between similar mental toughness subscales were found to be positive and significant but somewhat lower than expected (r = .49 to .62). Results suggest instrument subscales with similar labels are not measuring the same components of mental toughness.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: This paper tested relations between two measures of mental toughness. A sample of 110 male athletes (M age = 20.81 years; SD = 2.76), derived from University sports teams and local sports clubs, gave informed consent before completing two questionnaires to assess mental toughness. It was hypothesized that scales and subscales from the two different instruments, which purported to measure the same or substantially overlapping scales, would be strongly correlated. Predictions concerning the expected relations were made a priori. Pearson correlations revealed a significant and positive relationship between higher order mental toughness scores (r = .75; p <.001). Correlations between similar mental toughness subscales were found to be positive and significant but somewhat lower than expected (r = .49 to .62). Results suggest instrument subscales with similar labels are not measuring the same components of mental toughness.
Keywords: Confidence, Commitment, Construct validity, refdoi, ref26
Subjects: C Biological Sciences > C600 Sports Science
C Biological Sciences > C890 Psychology not elsewhere classified
Divisions: College of Social Sciences > Faculty of Health & Social Sciences > School of Sport & Exercise Science
Depositing User: Alison Wilson
Date Deposited: 10 Dec 2010 09:16
Last Modified: 18 Apr 2013 16:31
URI: http://eprints.lincoln.ac.uk/id/eprint/3702

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item