The impact of general practitioners working in or alongside emergency departments: a rapid realist review

Cooper, Alison and Davies, Freya and Edwards, Michelle and Anderson, Pippa and Carson-Stevens, Andrew and Cooke, Matthew W and Donaldson, Liam and Dale, Jeremy and Evans, Bridie Angela and Hibbert, Peter D and Hughes, Thomas C and Porter, Alison and Rainer, Tim and Siriwardena, Aloysius Niroshan and Snooks, Helen and Edwards, Adrian (2019) The impact of general practitioners working in or alongside emergency departments: a rapid realist review. BMJ Open, 9 (4). e024501. ISSN 2044-6055

Full content URL: http://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024501

Documents
The impact of general practitioners working in or alongside emergency departments: a rapid realist review
Publishers PDF
[img]
[Download]
[img] PDF
Cooper Impact of GPs in EDs a rapid realist review BMJ Open 2019.pdf - Whole Document
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International.

1MB
Item Type:Article
Item Status:Live Archive

Abstract

Objectives Worldwide, emergency healthcare systems are under intense pressure from ever-increasing demand and evidence is urgently needed to understand how this can be safely managed. An estimated 10%–43% of emergency department patients could be treated by primary care services. In England, this has led to a policy proposal and £100 million of funding (US$130 million), for emergency departments to stream appropriate patients to
a co-located primary care facility so they are ‘free to care for the sickest patients’. However, the research evidence to support this initiative is weak.
Design Rapid realist literature review.
Setting Emergency departments.
Inclusion criteria Articles describing general practitioners working in or alongside emergency departments.
Aim: To develop context-specific theories that explain how and why general practitioners working in or alongside emergency departments affect: patient flow; patient experience; patient safety and the wider healthcare system.
Results: Ninety-six articles contributed data to theory development sourced from earlier systematic reviews, updated database searches (Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane DSR & CRCT, DARE, HTA Database, BSC, PsycINFO and SCOPUS) and citation tracking. We developed theories to explain: how staff interpret the streaming system; different roles general practitioners adopt in the emergency department setting (traditional, extended, gatekeeper or emergency clinician) and how these factors influence patient (experience and safety) and organisational (demand and cost-effectiveness) outcomes.
Conclusions: Multiple factors influence the effectiveness of emergency department streaming to general practitioners; caution is needed in embedding the policy until further research and evaluation are available. Service models that encourage the traditional general practitioner approach may have shorter process times for non-urgent patients; however, there is little evidence that this frees up emergency department staff to care for the sickest
patients. Distinct primary care services offering increased patient choice may result in provider-induced demand. Economic evaluation and safety requires further research.
PROSPERO registration number CRD42017069741.

Keywords:general practitioner, GP, Emergency Department, ED, safety, effectiveness, realist, systematic review, patient flow, patient experience, patient safety, healthcare system, cost-effectiveness
Subjects:A Medicine and Dentistry > A300 Clinical Medicine
Divisions:College of Social Science > School of Health & Social Care
ID Code:35830
Deposited On:02 May 2019 10:21

Repository Staff Only: item control page