The Goldilocks question: what size is 'just right' for social care providers?

Glasby, Jon and Needham, Catherine and Allen, Kerry and Hall, Kelly and McKay, Steve (2018) The Goldilocks question: what size is 'just right' for social care providers? International Journal of Care and Caring, 2 (1). pp. 65-87. ISSN 2397-8821

Documents
Goldilocks paper (clean copy) January 2018_SY minor edits.docx
[img]
[Download]
[img] Microsoft Word
Goldilocks paper (clean copy) January 2018_SY minor edits.docx - Whole Document

89kB
Item Type:Article
Item Status:Live Archive

Abstract

Here we apply the ‘Goldilocks’ question to social care: what size of care provider is ‘just right’? Empirical research to date has struggled to find evidence for an optimal size for public service providers, although policymakers remain keen to suggest that size is a key aspect of organisational performance. The article makes an innovative contribution to this literature, drawing on empirical research with care providers and people who use their services in England. Findings from 143 interviews with people using different sized care services suggest that micro-organisations (employing five staff or fewer) achieve better outcomes for their cost-base than larger organisations, although our study is necessarily exploratory rather than statistically definitive. The salience of size in a social care setting provides a basis for hypothesising that organisational size may be more significant in relation to care than it has been found to be in broader public management literature, though research with larger and more robust samples is needed.

Keywords:social care, social enterprise, personalisation, disability, older people
Subjects:L Social studies > L510 Health & Welfare
L Social studies > L231 Public Administration
Divisions:College of Social Science > School of Social & Political Sciences
Related URLs:
ID Code:31501
Deposited On:04 Apr 2018 12:45

Repository Staff Only: item control page