Towards a taxonomy of logic models in systematic reviews and health technology assessments: a priori, staged, and iterative approaches

Rehfuess, Eva A. and Booth, Andrew and Brereton, Louise and Burns, Jacob and Gerhardus, Ansgar and Mozygemba, Kati and Oortwijn, Wija and Pfadenhauer, Lisa M. and Tummers, Marcia and van der Wilt, Gert-Jan and Rohwer, Anke (2018) Towards a taxonomy of logic models in systematic reviews and health technology assessments: a priori, staged, and iterative approaches. Research Synthesis Methods, 9 (1). pp. 13-24. ISSN 1759-2879

Full text not available from this repository.

Item Type:Article
Item Status:Live Archive

Abstract

The complexity associated with how interventions result—or fail to result—in outcomes and how context matters is increasingly recognised. Logic models provide an important tool for handling complexity, with contrasting uses in programme evaluation and evidence synthesis. To reconcile these, we developed an approach that combines the strengths of both traditions, propose a taxonomy of logic models, and provide guidance on how to choose between approaches and types of logic models in systematic reviews and health technology assessments (HTA).

The taxonomy distinguishes 3 approaches (a priori, staged, and iterative) and 2 types (systems‐based and process‐orientated) of logic models. An a priori logic model is specified at the start of the systematic review/HTA and remains unchanged. With a staged logic model, the reviewer prespecifies several points, at which major data inputs require a subsequent version. An iterative logic model is continuously modified throughout the systematic review/HTA process. System‐based logic models describe the system, in which the interaction between participants, intervention, and context takes place; process‐orientated models display the causal pathways leading from the intervention to multiple outcomes.

The proposed taxonomy of logic models offers an improved understanding of the advantages and limitations of logic models across the spectrum from a priori to fully iterative approaches. Choice of logic model should be informed by scope of evidence synthesis, presence/absence of clearly defined population, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) elements, and feasibility considerations. Applications across distinct interventions and methodological approaches will deliver good practice case studies and offer further insights on the choice and implementation of logic modelling approaches.

Keywords:Systematic reviews
Subjects:B Subjects allied to Medicine > B990 Subjects Allied to Medicine not elsewhere classified
Divisions:College of Social Science > School of Health & Social Care
Related URLs:
ID Code:31378
Deposited On:10 Apr 2018 10:31

Repository Staff Only: item control page