Does paired mentoring work? A study of the effectiveness and affective value of academically asymmetrical peer mentoring in supporting disadvantaged students in school science

Sharpe, Rachael and Abrahams, Ian and Fotou, Nikolaos (2018) Does paired mentoring work? A study of the effectiveness and affective value of academically asymmetrical peer mentoring in supporting disadvantaged students in school science. Research in Science & Technological Education, 36 (2). pp. 205-222. ISSN 0263-5143

Documents
__ddat04_staffhome_iabrahams_My articles_22 Sharpe, Abrahams & Fotou (2017) Does paired mentoring work A study of the effectiveness and affective value of academically asymmetrical peer mentoring in supporting disadvantaged students in school science.pdf

Request a copy
28892.pdf

Request a copy
[img] PDF
__ddat04_staffhome_iabrahams_My articles_22 Sharpe, Abrahams & Fotou (2017) Does paired mentoring work A study of the effectiveness and affective value of academically asymmetrical peer mentoring in supporting disadvantaged students in school science.pdf - Whole Document
Restricted to Repository staff only

2MB
[img] PDF
28892.pdf - Whole Document
Restricted to Repository staff only until 26 March 2019.

1MB
Item Type:Article
Item Status:Live Archive

Abstract

Background: In England, there is a growing need to improve the lives of secondary school students who are defined as disadvantaged and to support these students in their attainment and attitudes to secondary school science.
Purpose: This paper reports on a project designed to support students from disadvantaged backgrounds by pairing them with undergraduate mentors from a university throughout the final year of their compulsory science education in England (Year 11 – aged 15–16) at the end of which students take their public General Certificate of Secondary Education (GCSE) examinations.
Sample: The study, set up as a randomised control trial, involved 86 disadvantaged students – students from low-income families who are eligible for free school meals, or had been looked after for more
than six months, or whose parent(s) are currently in the Armed Forces. Four schools were recruited. The schools were similar in terms of the proportion of free school meals, GCSE 5A*-C measures and valueadded
performance to reduce the likelihood of any effect being attributable to factors other than mentoring.
Design and methods: Students were recruited from four schools and were randomly assigned to experimental and control groups – half in each group. Experimental group students were mentored for
one hour per week for 23 weeks up until their GCSE examinations with an intensive six-hour mentoring session just prior to those examinations. Data were collected from the Year 11’s mock and actual
GCSE examination results as well as questionnaires from Year 11 and undergraduate mentors.
Results: It was found that mentored students did statistically better in terms of attainment in both mock and actual GCSEs examinations and also showed a statistically significantly greater improvement in their attitudes to science than un-mentored students.
Conclusions: These findings indicate the value of academically asymmetrical paired mentoring for disadvantaged students within science.

Keywords:Paired mentoring, Attitudes, Summative Asssessment, secondary School
Subjects:X Education > X300 Academic studies in Education
X Education > X330 Academic studies in Secondary Education
Divisions:College of Social Science > School of Education
Related URLs:
ID Code:28892
Deposited On:04 Oct 2017 12:57

Repository Staff Only: item control page