Investigating medical handover practice: a process evaluation of a new initiative from an acute setting

Thomson, Anna and Kane, Ros and Jackson, Christine and Allen-Collinson, Jacquelyn and Boardman, Shirine and Nelson, David (2015) Investigating medical handover practice: a process evaluation of a new initiative from an acute setting. Project Report. University of Lincoln.

Documents
__ddat04_staffhome_athomson_RDS_Desktop_Grantham EAU Handover Report - 13 08 2015.docx

Request a copy
28878 EAU Handover Report - 13 08 2015.pdf
[img]
[Download]
[img] Microsoft Word
__ddat04_staffhome_athomson_RDS_Desktop_Grantham EAU Handover Report - 13 08 2015.docx
Restricted to Repository staff only

245kB
[img]
Preview
PDF
28878 EAU Handover Report - 13 08 2015.pdf - Whole Document

710kB
Item Type:Paper or Report (Project Report)
Item Status:Live Archive

Abstract

Aims: To independently evaluate and assess the potential benefits and drawbacks of an innovative approach to the delivery of morning medical handover, in an acute medical emergency assessment unit (EAU).
Methods: A survey was conducted with junior and middle-grade doctors attending the handover (N = 14).
Three focus groups, with middle-grade doctors (n = 5), junior doctors (n = 11) and senior nurses (n = 3), were conducted to gain further insights into the views and experiences of attendees. Interviews with two medical consultants and two directors of postgraduate medical education were conducted to gain insight into the strategic training and management perspective. Focus groups and interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analysed using thematic analysis. The timeframe was May–August 2014.
Results: Quantitative survey data were analysed using SPSS, generating descriptive frequencies. 79% of respondents preferred to discuss safety incidents verbally, 79% found it helpful to learn about clinical guidelines and 50% regarded the process as too long on most days. Qualitative findings revealed that the handover was regarded as a crucial process for prioritising and managing patients and communicating critical information across a multidisciplinary team. Including a nursing perspective was consistently viewed as particularly beneficial, owing to nurses’ detailed overview of patients within the unit. Discussing audit results, care bundles and clinical reminders was viewed as well placed, owing to their concise nature. However, the danger of detracting from the clinical handover by incorporating education and a lack of a consistent clear focus was highlighted. Detailed patient presentations and theoretical discussions were considered to be more suitable in an alternative setting, potentially during rounds and bedside teaching. Suggestions of utilising an electronic system, separating the night team handover from an EAU morning meeting, and changing shift times were also discussed.
Conclusions: The foremost principle of a handover is to ensure that there is a robust clinical handover of continuous patient care from the outgoing to the incoming team. While there is the potential to
augment this process with unique educational elements, it is essential that the delivery and content are carefully managed and structured in a manner that does not detract from the primary focus of a clinical handover and compromise clinical decision making. The handover model may benefit from having a more consistent time-bound structure, allowing the team to have a clear focus on managing and directing optimal patient care, whilst providing relevant educational aspects that improve patient safety and quality of care.

Keywords:Medical handover, Acute care, Future hospitals, Medical education, Safety
Subjects:B Subjects allied to Medicine > B990 Subjects Allied to Medicine not elsewhere classified
Divisions:College of Social Science > School of Health & Social Care
ID Code:28878
Deposited On:04 Oct 2017 08:59

Repository Staff Only: item control page