Crust, Lee and Keegan, Richard (2010) Mental toughness and attitudes to risk-taking. Personality and Individual Differences, 49 (3). pp. 164-168. ISSN 0191-8869

PDF MT_and_Risk_(copy).pdf - Whole Document Restricted to Repository staff only Download (169Kb) | Request a copy

Abstract

This paper tested the relationship between mental toughness and attitudes towards risk-taking in undergraduate student athletes attending two universities in the north of England. A sample of 69 men (M age = 22.2 years, s = 5.28) and 36 women (M age = 24.6 years, s = 7.67) participated and ranged from club to national level in a variety of sports. Participants gave informed consent before completing questionnaires to assess mental toughness and attitudes towards risk. Pearson Product Moment Correlations found significant and positive correlations between overall mental toughness and attitudes towards physical risks, but no relationship with psychological risk. Regression analysis found the mental toughness subscale of challenge to be the most significant predictor of attitudes towards physical risk. Interpersonal confidence was the only mental toughness subscale found to be significantly and positively related to attitudes towards psychological risk. Independent t-tests found men reported significantly higher overall mental toughness, confidence in abilities, and attitudes towards both physical and psychological risk, than women. These results are discussed with regard to previous research findings and future researchers are encouraged to consider employing experimental methodologies in order to manipulate contextual factors to more fully understand any individual differences.

Item Type:	Article
Additional Information:	This paper tested the relationship between mental toughness and attitudes towards risk-taking in undergraduate student athletes attending two universities in the north of England. A sample of 69 men (M age = 22.2 years, s = 5.28) and 36 women (M age = 24.6 years, s = 7.67) participated and ranged from club to national level in a variety of sports. Participants gave informed consent before completing questionnaires to assess mental toughness and attitudes towards risk. Pearson Product Moment Correlations found significant and positive correlations between overall mental toughness and attitudes towards physical risks, but no relationship with psychological risk. Regression analysis found the mental toughness subscale of challenge to be the most significant predictor of attitudes towards physical risk. Interpersonal confidence was the only mental toughness subscale found to be significantly and positively related to attitudes towards psychological risk. Independent t-tests found men reported significantly higher overall mental toughness, confidence in abilities, and attitudes towards both physical and psychological risk, than women. These results are discussed with regard to previous research findings and future researchers are encouraged to consider employing experimental methodologies in order to manipulate contextual factors to more fully understand any individual differences.
Keywords:	Commitment, Control, Confidence, Risk, refdoi, ref26
Subjects:	C Biological Sciences > C600 Sports Science C Biological Sciences > C800 Psychology
Divisions:	College of Social Sciences > Faculty of Health & Social Sciences > School of Sport & Exercise Science
Depositing User:	Lee Crust
Date Deposited:	12 May 2010 21:15
Last Modified:	18 Apr 2013 16:32
URI:	http://eprints.lincoln.ac.uk/id/eprint/2436

Actions (login required)

View Item