Dawson, David L. and Barnes-Holmes, Dermot and Gresswell, David M. and Hart, Aidan J. and Gore, Nick J. (2009) Assessing the implicit beliefs of sexual offenders using the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure: a first study. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 21 (1). pp. 57-75. ISSN 1079-0632
Full content URL: http://sax.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/21/1/5...
SO-IRAP_(published).pdf - Whole Document
Restricted to Repository staff only
|Item Status:||Live Archive|
Researchers have proposed that the cognitive distortions of sexual offenders are underpinned by a number of implicit cognitive processes termed implicit theories. Until
recently, however, the implicit theory hypothesis has received little empirical support due to broader limitations with standard forensic assessment procedures. The current research aimed to determine whether a new assessment methodology, the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP), could provide further evidence for Ward and Keenan’s (1999) children as sexual beings implicit theory. The results indicated that the
IRAP was significantly more effective at identifying core implicit differences between sexual offenders against children and nonoffenders than a cognitive distortion
questionnaire. Furthermore, although both groups demonstrated an overall response bias towards adults as sexual and children as nonsexual, this bias was significantly impaired in the sexual offender group. The findings are discussed in relation to previous
implicit theory research and recommendations for the development of implicit methodologies are made.
|Keywords:||implicit beliefs, cognitive distortions, sexual offending, Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure, IRAP|
|Subjects:||C Biological Sciences > C800 Psychology|
C Biological Sciences > C840 Clinical Psychology
|Divisions:||College of Social Science > School of Psychology|
|Deposited On:||29 Jan 2010 11:47|
Repository Staff Only: item control page