Child support judgments: comparing public policy to the public's policy

Ellman, Ira Mark and McKay, Steve and Miles, Joanna and Bryson, Caroline (2014) Child support judgments: comparing public policy to the public's policy. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 28 (3). pp. 274-301. ISSN 1360-9939

Documents
17965 ELLMAN ET AL final after acceptance.pdf
[img]
[Download]
[img]
Preview
PDF
17965 ELLMAN ET AL final after acceptance.pdf - Whole Document

311kB
Item Type:Article
Item Status:Live Archive

Abstract

Any child support regime necessarily makes policy choices about how parental income should be shared between the two parental households. Those choices involve balancing the claims of the child, the claims of the custodial parent for help with the expense of providing for the child, and the claims of the support obligor for autonomy in deciding how to spend his own earnings. That balancing task is complicated by the fact that the child and the custodial parent necessarily share a living standard, so that any child support transfer, large or small, will unavoidably benefit the custodial parent as well as the child. This article reports the findings of an empirical study designed to reveal how the British public believe this balance should be struck. It then compares the public’s preferred policies to the policy choices implicit in the current UK child support schedule. It concludes that there are important gaps between the two, and recommends that consideration be given to amending the current UK law to better align it with the public’s values on these matters.

Keywords:child support, public attitudes, NotOAChecked
Subjects:L Social studies > L410 UK Social Policy
M Law > M111 English Law
Divisions:College of Social Science > School of Social & Political Sciences
Related URLs:
ID Code:17965
Deposited On:24 Jul 2015 09:47

Repository Staff Only: item control page