IMPORTANT NOTICE: We are putting the finishing touches to this new version of the repository; please bear with us! If you have any questions, please contact eprints.lincoln.ac.uk.

The welfare consequences and efficacy of training pet dogs with remote electronic training collars in comparison to reward based training

Cooper, Jonathan J. and Cracknell, Nina and Hardiman, Jessica and Wright, Hannah and Mills, Daniel (2014) The welfare consequences and efficacy of training pet dogs with remote electronic training collars in comparison to reward based training. PloS one, 9 (9). e102722. ISSN 1932-6203

Full content URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0102722

Documents
17566 PMC4153538.pdf
[img]
[Download]
[img]
Preview
PDF
17566 PMC4153538.pdf - Whole Document
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

520kB
Item Type:Article
Item Status:Live Archive

Abstract

This study investigated the welfare consequences of training dogs in the field with manually operated electronic devices (e-collars). Following a preliminary study on 9 dogs, 63 pet dogs referred for recall related problems were assigned to one of three Groups: Treatment Group A were trained by industry approved trainers using e-collars; Control Group B trained by the same trainers but without use of e-collars; and Group C trained by members of the Association of Pet Dog Trainers, UK again without e-collar stimulation (n = 21 for each Group). Dogs received two 15 minute training sessions per day for 4-5 days. Training sessions were recorded on video for behavioural analysis. Saliva and urine were collected to assay for cortisol over the training period. During preliminary studies there were negative changes in dogs' behaviour on application of electric stimuli, and elevated cortisol post-stimulation. These dogs had generally experienced high intensity stim uli without pre-warning cues during training. In contrast, in the subsequent larger, controlled study, trainers used lower settings with a pre-warning function and behavioural responses were less marked. Nevertheless, Group A dogs spent significantly more time tense, yawned more often and engaged in less environmental interaction than Group C dogs. There was no difference in urinary corticosteroids between Groups. Salivary cortisol in Group A dogs was not significantly different from that in Group B or Group C, though Group C dogs showed higher measures than Group B throughout sampling. Following training 92% of owners reported improvements in their dog's referred behaviour, and there was no significant difference in reported efficacy across Groups. Owners of dogs trained using e-collars were less confident of applying the training approach demonstrated. These findings suggest that there is no consistent benefit to be gained from e-collar training but greater welfare concer! ns compared with positive reward based training.

Keywords:Dog training aids, JCOpen
Subjects:D Veterinary Sciences, Agriculture and related subjects > D300 Animal Science
D Veterinary Sciences, Agriculture and related subjects > D328 Animal Welfare
Divisions:College of Science > School of Life Sciences
ID Code:17566
Deposited On:15 Jun 2015 12:20

Repository Staff Only: item control page