Effects of surgically implanted tags and translocation on the movements of common bream Abramis brama (L.)

Gardner, Chris J. and Deeming, D. Charles and Wellby, Ian and Soulsbury, Carl D. and Eady, Paul E. (2015) Effects of surgically implanted tags and translocation on the movements of common bream Abramis brama (L.). Fisheries Research, 167 . pp. 252-259. ISSN 0165-7836

Documents
FR Gardner et al 2015 (2).pdf

Request a copy
__ddat01_staffhome_bjones_RDS_Desktop_Gardner et al 2015.pdf
[img]
[Download]
[img] PDF
FR Gardner et al 2015 (2).pdf - Whole Document
Restricted to Repository staff only

841kB
[img]
Preview
PDF
__ddat01_staffhome_bjones_RDS_Desktop_Gardner et al 2015.pdf - Whole Document

396kB
Item Type:Article
Item Status:Live Archive

Abstract

Data collected from wildlife telemetry studies relies on tagging and attachment having minimal impactson behaviour. Though a widespread technique, relatively few studies evaluate the impacts of differingtagging methods on both welfare and behaviour. Here we use tracking data, collected for other aims, toinvestigate the impact of inter-peritoneal surgical implantation of acoustic transmitters on the healthand behaviour of common bream, Abramis brama (L.). In five separate capture events, the behaviour interms of distances moved and linear range of newly tagged fish (n = 61) were compared to previouslytagged fish (n = 55) present in the same river at the same time. In the first 5 days post-tagging, newlytagged fish moved significantly further than previously tagged fish. Despite this difference, the linearranges moved by the two groups of fish were equivalent. During 6–10 days post tagging there was nosignificant differences between the two groups. Thus, the tagging procedure had short term, but not longterm behavioural impacts. In addition, a number of tagged fish were recaptured between 51 and 461days post-surgery. Recaptured fish appeared to have clean, well-healed incisions and exhibited ‘normal’behaviour in that they were caught alongside a large number of conspecifics. Three recaptured taggedfish were translocated ∼35 km downstream, to ascertain how translocation would affect their behaviour.The translocated fish had a greater linear range than control fish, with all three fish returning to the siteof capture within 6 to 24 days, suggesting that common bream can exhibit site fidelity.

Keywords:Aquatic telemetry, Surgical implantation, Effects of tagging, Abramis brama (L.), Translocation, JCNotOpen
Subjects:D Veterinary Sciences, Agriculture and related subjects > D300 Animal Science
D Veterinary Sciences, Agriculture and related subjects > D328 Animal Welfare
Divisions:College of Science > School of Life Sciences
ID Code:16989
Deposited On:30 Mar 2015 09:01

Repository Staff Only: item control page