The influence of onsets and offsets on saccade programming

Hermens, Frouke and Walker, Robin (2010) The influence of onsets and offsets on saccade programming. i-Perception, 1 (2). pp. 83-94. ISSN 2041-6695

Full content URL: http://i-perception.perceptionweb.com/fulltext/i01...

Full text not available from this repository.

Item Type:Article
Item Status:Live Archive

Abstract

When making a saccadic eye movement to a peripheral target, a simultaneous stimulus onset at central fixation generally increases saccadic latency, while offsets reduce latency ('gap effect'). Visual onsets remote from fixation also increase latency ('remote distractor effect'); however, the influence of remote visual offsets is less clear. Previous studies, which used a search task, found that remote offsets either facilitated, inhibited, or did nothing to saccade latencies towards a peripheral target. It cannot be excluded, however, that the target selection process in such search tasks influenced the results. We therefore simplified the task and asked participants to make eye movements to a predictable target. Simultaneously with target onset, either one or multiple remote stimulus onsets and offsets were presented. It was found that peripheral onsets increased saccade latencies, but offsets did not influence the initiation of a saccade to the target. Moreover, the number of onsets and offsets did not affect the results. These results suggest that earlier effects of remote stimulus offsets and of the number of remote distractor onsets reside in the target identification process of the visual search task rather than the competition between possible saccade goals. The results are discussed in the context of models of saccade target selection.

Keywords:eye movements
Subjects:C Biological Sciences > C830 Experimental Psychology
Divisions:College of Social Science > School of Psychology
ID Code:16378
Deposited On:08 Jan 2015 16:29

Repository Staff Only: item control page