Group size and relative competitive ability: geometric progressions as a conceptual tool

Humphries, Stuart and Ruxton, Graeme D. and Metcalfe, Neil B. (2000) Group size and relative competitive ability: geometric progressions as a conceptual tool. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 47 (3). pp. 113-118. ISSN 0340-5443

Full content URL: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs002650...

Documents
Group size and relative competitive ability: geometric progressions as a conceptual tool

Request a copy
[img] PDF
__ddat02_staffhome_jpartridge_art%3A10.1007%2Fs002650050001.pdf - Whole Document
Restricted to Repository staff only

52kB
Item Type:Article
Item Status:Live Archive

Abstract

Contrary to the assumptions of many previous theoretical models, group size has recently been shown in experiments to have an effect on the relative (as well as absolute) competitive abilities of group members. Here we introduce a novel and effective mathematical tool for describing how relative competitive ability will change for any two specified individuals within a group as group size changes. We show that there is no simple general rule for describing how relative competitive ability will change with group size. A subsequent empirical test of the model helps to illustrate that very specific knowledge of the system under study is needed in order to produce robust predictions.

Keywords:behavioral ecology, competitive ability, group size
Subjects:C Biological Sciences > C180 Ecology
Divisions:College of Science > School of Life Sciences
Related URLs:
ID Code:15284
Deposited On:19 Dec 2014 11:42

Repository Staff Only: item control page