ERP evidence for human early visual sensitivity to co-linearity compared to co-circularity

Hall, Sophie S. and Pollux, Petra M. J. and Roebuck, Hettie and Guo, Kun (2013) ERP evidence for human early visual sensitivity to co-linearity compared to co-circularity. Neuroscience Letters , 556 . pp. 46-51. ISSN 0304-3940

Full content URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2013.09.065

Documents
Neuroscience Letters 2013-46.pdf

Request a copy
[img] PDF
Neuroscience Letters 2013-46.pdf - Whole Document
Restricted to Repository staff only

819kB
Item Type:Article
Item Status:Live Archive

Abstract

Our complex visual environment is constrained by natural geometric regularities, including spatiotem-poral regularity, co-linearity and co-circularity. To investigate human visual processing associated withthese regularities we directly compared the neural processes in encoding dynamic co-linearity and co-circularity using event-related potentials (ERPs). By recording ERPs to a target bar presented alone (nocontext) or in a dynamic sequence of bars following a co-linear or co-circular path, we observed earlierERPs to targets embedded in co-linear sequence at early (66 ms) and later stages (197 ms) of post-targetprocessing. In contrast, targets in co-circular sequence only modulated ERPs at later stages of processing.It is proposed that early visual processing may have adapted to efficiently process co-linearity to improvetarget identification, whereas sensitivity to co-circularity does not occur until later stages of processing.These results have significant impact for understanding brain-behaviour relationships when processingnatural geometric regularities.

Keywords:Co-linearity, Co-circularity, Prediction, Event-related potentials
Subjects:C Biological Sciences > C830 Experimental Psychology
Divisions:College of Social Science > School of Psychology
ID Code:12526
Deposited On:08 Nov 2013 16:45

Repository Staff Only: item control page